After finishing the VK3YE Micro 40 DSB Transceiver, I did fool around with crystal radios a little, but didn’t pursue those experiments very far. Perhaps they will continue at some point. However, thinking about crystal radio sets did keep me on the subject of Medium Wave AM Broadcast Band listening for long enough to find out about the hobby of Ultralight DXing, which is the hobby of listening for distant stations (usually on the MW AM BC band) using modest portable receivers. Some enthusiasts cite a receiver price of $100 and less as a cut-off point, and that seems like a reasonable definition.
It’s a neat hobby, and there is a lot to be heard for the dedicated listener. The fact that it can be done with a modest set-up only adds to the appeal. In 2007, Gary De Bock N7EKX discovered that a little Walkman radio from Sony, the SRF-59, had very good AM performance, and cost under $20 new. Others acquired their own SRF-59’s and also found that considering that it’s just a small, cheap receiver with an analog tuning dial, it has surprising sensitivity and selectivity. Unfortunately, in order to achieve the best performance, an alignment is recommended, as many of them came out of the factory with less than optimum performance. Earlier models, such as the clear-cased prison issue SRF-39FP, had much better factory alignment as well as a higher quality tuning capacitor, but they cost more. If you’re willing to pop open the case yourself and perform 2 fairly straightforward adjustments, you can have a sensitive, selective and very portable receiver for the 530-1700KHz broadcast band.
How does a cheap receiver like this manage to provide sensitivity as well as selectivity, with excellent image rejection and almost no birdies? Well, take a look at the one I scored on eBay for $3.50 plus $3 shipping, and I’ll tell you –
This receiver uses a proprietary Sony chip – the CXA1129N. They have not released any data on this chip but after it had been on the market for a while, the basic architecture was figured out. This radio uses a low IF of just 55KHz on the AM band. Yes – that’s not a typo – the IF is 55KHz, which gives great selectivity. Think about those other cheapie portables you have that cannot receive a weak station on a channel adjacent to a local powerhouse. The selectivity on this receiver really helps with those kinds of situations. The problem with such a low IF is, of course, images, which would only be 110KHz apart. Sony get around this by using a quadrature mixing scheme that splits the LO signal into 2, and phase shifts one of the signals, before mixing them back together. This cancels out the images that would otherwise be a serious problem in this design. What a great idea to implement a scheme like this in such a cheap little receiver! It runs off a single AA cell too – reportedly, the main chip will operate down to 0.95V. On reading about this, I had to have one, and when I found the above used one for just $6.50 inc shipping on eBay, it was a no-brainer. It came with the Sony earbuds pictured above though when supplied as new, it comes with a set of light headphones.
Out of the package, it sounded pretty good but I had the nagging feeling it wasn’t receiving as well as it could. Gary De Bock, who has performed many alignments on these units for DX’ers, reported that a significant number of them benefited from adjustment. Although the frequency calibration wasn’t too far off on most, nearly all of them needed some tweaking to the 2 tracking adjustments. Mine, it turned out, did too.
I won’t describe the alignment process in detail, as there is all sorts of info about it documented by more knowledgeable people than me. This post by Gary in the Ultralight DX Group on Yahoo Groups, describes it in detail. Also, this page shows how to disassemble and reassemble the receiver and has some good info too. Both links open in new browser windows. Here is Gary De Bock’s first review of the SRF-59, published in late 2007.
When I first popped the case off, according to instructions I had read, the board is glued to the back part of the case, so the front part is supposed to separate first. It didn’t happen that way for me – my back part came off first. This image also shows the trimcap that is adjusted for maximum signal at about 1400KHz. If you don’t have a signal generator (I don’t) you can use a weak off-air signal –
This view shows both parts of the case separated from the board –
The view from the other side –
The other adjustment that needs to be made is shown in the next image. The smaller coil is secured to the ferrite rod with wax. The wax is scraped away (I used a small jeweler’s screwdriver) so that it can slide up and down the rod. Then, with the radio either listening to a signal from the sig gen at 600KHz, or a weak off-air signal at or near 600KHz, the smaller coil is slid up and down the rod until the point of maximum signal is found. Gary recommends to use a small piece of tape or woodworking glue to secure the coil in it’s new position; I smeared the wax that I had previously scraped off back onto the coil and warmed it very briefly with a match to melt it again. In this photo, I had already made this adjustment (my coil needed to be moved closer to the main coil for maximum signal) –
A closer view –
You can, if you wish, adjust the frequency dial calibration too. This process is described in the links I have provided, but it was relatively close in the unit I had. There is a limit to how accurate such a basic dial can be anyway, and it is not too hard to figure out where you are if you use powerful local stations as markers. The fact that US stations are spaced at standard 10KHz intervals helps a lot as well.
I have only spent a couple of evenings listening at home so far. The electrical QRM is quite severe in my place at night. It clears up significantly when I walk out into the street, but standing in the middle of my street at night is not the most comfortable position for a long listening session! So far, I have heard stations up and down the west coast, from Mexican “border blasters” on the Mexican side of the border, San Diego, Los Angeles, Las Vegas and up into Oregon, from my home in the SF Bay Area, as well as stations in the central California valley. This is all straightforward stuff – to be hearing stations up to 500 miles distant, but I’m really looking forward to hearing my first Trans-Pacific (TP) DX. There are quite a few powerful broadcasters in Asia that can be heard here on the west coast, as well as inland, when conditions are good.
Anyway, instead of waiting until I had logged some serious DX, I wanted to share my excitement at this neat little receiver. It has reminded me of the pleasure I used to get from simple radios as a teenager. In fact, I even took it to bed last night and went under the covers with it and a flashlight (to see the dial)! The last time I did this with a radio was as a youngster 🙂
The appeal of the Sony SRF-59 for me is similar to the appeal that some sports cars hold for driving enthusiasts. In the same way that basic suspension and a lack of luxury features in sports cars like the early British Triumphs made the driver feel closer to the road, there is not much in the Sony SRF-59 to get between you and the AM band. Having said that, it performs better than it’s counterparts from a few decades ago. I love the fact that a newcomer to DXing could, if he/she kept an eye out for a good used deal, get started with this radio, and a small notebook for a logbook, for less than $10. Excellent! I have already had lots of fun for my $6.50, end expect to have much, much more. Stick this in your bag or shirt pocket the next time you go for a walk or hike (or camping), and you’re guaranteed lots of listening fun.
PS – I bought this radio for the AM performance in such a small, cheap radio (and the novelty of the technology used in such a package). It sounds nice on FM but the reason to own this receiver, IMO, is for it’s AM band.
PPS – This little receiver has quite a dedicated set of followers. Some people have hooked the board up to air-spaced variable capacitors and vernier drives, with larger cases, knobs, input/output jacks etc. Others have modded it for different bands. With such a cheap radio, there’s not much to lose if you mess up your mod.
PPPS – Some have commented on how the tuning is too fiddly with the small thumbwheel. I haven’t found this to be a problem – I engage my thumbnail with the teeth of the thumbwheel and find it easy to make small adjustments. If you have very short nails, this might not work for you. I saw a mod in which the rectangular slot for the thumbwheel was widened, exposing a greater width of the thumbwheel.
16 thoughts on “AM Broadcast Band Dxing – With A $3.50 Radio!”
Hi Dave, Dar here W9HZC. Back in the early 70’s while stationed in upper NY state (Plattsburgh) I built a 6 meter transceiver (AM) featured in one of the Hand Books of the time which used a couple of transistors for the Transmitter, a BCB down converter and a radio shack audio amp board both on Xmit and receive and one of the Radio shack pocket transistor BCB receiver. It worked great. Wish I remembered where heck I put it!! bet this little toy would right at home in side the box. Have a good one, Dar.. W9HZC – HBQRP http://www.hbqrp.org
Dar – good to hear from you again – hope you’re doing well!
Hi Dave, I have been following your blog for about a year now and have always enjoyed reading about your experiences. This one cost me money. I received my brand new Sony SRF-59 today! I had no idea there was such a interest in using this kind of radio for the purpose you described. Thank you for the links and thank you for the effort you put into blogging! 73, Harold Hall-wb5kzo
Harold – Apologies for costing you money but I hope you’ll agree that it performs quite well! Please do consider making the 2 tracking adjustments – to the smaller coil on the ferrite rod, and to the one trimmer on the back of the tuning capacitor, as shown in this post. Gary De Bock performed many free adjustments for owners of SRF-59’s (not sure if he still does them) and found that the majority benefited from a simple alignment. It certainly helped mine.
Let me know what you think – I’ll be interested to hear,
Hi Dave, This is Gary DeBock (N7EKX), the chief instigator of the SRF-59 Ultralight radio craze starting in late 2007. I appreciate your interest in the tiny radio’s capabilities, and wish you the best in tracking down some Trans-Pacific AM DX stations on it! Be advised that once you accomplish such a goal, however, you run the serious risk of becoming a raving fanatic like the rest of us. Consider yourself forewarned… 🙂 73, Gary
Gary – what a pleasure to hear from you – and thank you for generating such a great deal of interest in this little radio. You are responsible for many happy hours spent listening by many people!
I did this modification today on the SRF-59 using Nashville 650 Khz as a referencing station from Indiana during daylight. The results on the device are fabulous! Thanks Dave and Gary for the info, tutorials and expertise… See you in the Grayline! Mark (KC9TSR)
That’s fantastic Mark. The selectivity for such a small and cheap receiver is what I like so much – and the low power consumption from just one AA. Great stuff – enjoy your “new” receiver!
Great to see some on line chat amongst people not abusing all and sundry. Being a radio tradesman I love these little “toys” which provide so much enjoyment listening and learning from national broadcasters without fuss.
I have a SRF-39 (clear-cased “prison version” of the SRF-59) which was modified (by another hobbyist) with an external digital frequency readout module from http://www.AADE.com. It works very well, and makes the radio very enjoyable to tune since there is no guesswork in the frequency. There is a bit of digital “buzz” or hash emitted by the display, but I can switch off the display after I stop tuning, in order to listen to a station without the slight interference. I need to investigate if winding the display’s connecting cable around a ferrite toroid will solve the noise.
You do some really amazing manhattan style construction of your circuits. My mind set is sort of like yours, I love building receivers. You did a great job on the Sproutie I and II. Your website has some excellent photographs. I was wondering if you designed this website yourself and do your own coding. I see you used WordPress. Can you rewrite your text on certain pages and add to it later or is it all done at one time. I noticed you recently did a redo on all your web pages. I am thinking about setting one up myself. Keep up the nice work.
Best of Luck
Bob F. N1TGI
Thank you for the kind words Bob. I’m afraid that I know next to nothing about web design, or any kind of coding. WordPress.com make having your own blog quite easy, and as far as the layout and design goes, I am simply using one of their standard layouts, which I recently changed, as you noticed.
I write the posts and save them as drafts, and can choose when to publish them. After “publication” I am free to go back and edit them whenever, and as many times as, I please. That’s a feature of having my own blog/site that I think of as a huge advantage over writing for print publications. Once an article is submitted to a print publication, it is largely out of my control. If there are errors, or if I wish to add to it afterwards, I am out of luck. The internet is such a great tool for learning and sharing!
After stumbling on this I just had to have my hand on one of these gadgets.. So I placed an order.. cost on Ebay is up a bit higher than yours but still very reasonable.
The Yahoo web site really gave me some awesome ideas..
My eyes about popped when I saw what that one guy did with that National Vernier.. Looked as nice as your newer Sproutie MKII.
One thing that caught my attention was a guy who put external variables on both the tuning and the tracking and his comment was that when he dialed in a station he was positive that the radio was perfectly tuned since he was tracking manually.. He said that he doubted that the tracking on a normal radio was perfect. That gave me an idea.. purposely detune the on-board tracking (on the side of less capacity) and add a outboard trimmer. Center the trimmer and then retune the tracking on the onboard as normal.. That would allow you to tweek the tracking especially at the lower edge of the band.. similar to an antenna trim on an old radio.
So… I have no idea where this will take me.. I do however thank you for putting together this web site.
Me again.. I looked at the SRF-88 on a youtube teardown video (by a guy who was just guessing his way around in it) and it uses the same CXA1129N chip. .. The board looks very similar (layout and part wise) to the SRF59 .. It does not seem to be in big demand on Ebay.. I found a couple of them on Ebay for less than $10 (just missing volume knob).. Now that’s more like it..
Hi Ken. I wasn’t aware that the SRF-88 uses the same chip. It wouldn’t gain much traction with the ultralight crowd, as it seems to be significantly larger than the SRF-39, 49 and 59 series. SRF-39’s tend to go for lower prices than the 59, though it’s the same radio, electrically. There is the possible exception of a different value capacitor and/or resistor in the AF amp, leading to a very slightly different audio response.
Hi Ken – sorry for the very brief reply, as I have my head in a project right now. SRF-39’s can still be found in good condition for around $10. I’ve seen a few on eBay recently. Patience is the key!